Twelve-Month Clinical Outcomes of Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Hemodynamically Stable Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Zeeshan
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Kiflain
dc.contributor.authorRahim, Tariq
dc.contributor.authorHaq, Ijaz Ul
dc.contributor.authorNawaz, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Izaz Ali
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-05T09:20:41Z
dc.date.copyright2026
dc.date.issued2026-08-31
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study compared 12-month clinical outcomes following multivessel primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and culprit-only PCI among hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) treated at a tertiary care cardiac center in Pakistan. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study included 400 consecutive patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD undergoing primary PCI at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. Patients were equally divided into multivessel PCI (n=200) and culprit-only PCI (n=200) groups. The primary outcome was 12-month MACE, comprising cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, acute kidney injury, and major bleeding Results: A total of 400 patients were analyzed, with comparable baseline characteristics between groups. At 12 months, multivessel PCI significantly reduced MACE (13.5% vs. 22.5%; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.93; p=0.019) and unplanned revascularization (6.0% vs. 13.5%; p=0.011) compared with culprit-only PCI. After adjustment, multivessel PCI remained independently associated with lower MACE (adjusted OR 0.487; p=0.011) and repeat revascularization (adjusted OR 0.383; p=0.010). Although acute kidney injury was initially more frequent with multivessel PCI (12.5% vs. 5.5%; p=0.014), this association was not significant after adjustment. No significant differences were observed in mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, or major bleeding Conclusion: Among hemodynamically stable patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, multivessel PCI was associated with fewer 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events and repeat coronary revascularizations than culprit-only PCI.
dc.format.extentpp. 1119-1129
dc.identifier.citationPakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 59 No. 4 (2026), pp. 1119-1129
dc.identifier.doi10.47144/gy3tm183
dc.identifier.urihttps://pakheartjournal.com/index.php/pk/article/view/3870
dc.identifier.urihttps://ds.pakheartjournal.com/handle/phj/1203
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPakistan Heart Journal
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 59 No. 4 (2026)
dc.rights.holderPakistan Heart Journal
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.titleTwelve-Month Clinical Outcomes of Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Hemodynamically Stable Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
dc.typeArticle
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-7920-6227
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-3725-8797
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-7067-231X
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-0033-7431
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-6597-2164
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-3826-1105
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-2483-1928

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6a93067fe502e.pdf
Size:
558 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections