COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS SCORE IN ICU-HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS INDICATES HIGHER NUTRITIONAL RISK AMONG POST CABG SUBJECTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN THE NORTH OF IRAN

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Haghighatkhah, Motahare

Ghorbani, Zeinab

Vakilpour, Azin

Pouryousefi, Elahe

Balou, Heydar Ali

Roshan, Marjan Mahdavi

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Pakistan Heart Journal

Abstract

Objectives: The current cross-sectional study intended to provide a comparative evaluation of nutritional status in the intensive care unit (ICU)-hospitalized patients according to the reasons for admission. Methodology: A total of 258 patients hospitalized for >24-hour in the ICU between February 2020- July 2021 were included. The subjects were categorized into five categories: burned injury (n=27), COVID-19 or other respiratory disorders (n=64), post coronary artery bypass graft surgery (post-CABG) (n=50), trauma (n=57), and miscellaneous causes (n=60). A modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score was applied to explore the nutritional status of the patients. Results: On average, the patients were 58± 16 years old that 46% (n=119) of them were females. The mean± SD of mNUTRIC score among patients with burned 2±1 and COVID-19 or other respiratory disorders 2±1 tended to be significantly lower than the others, including post-CABG 3±0 and patients with miscellaneous causes 3±2 (p-value=0.001). According to mNUTRIC score classifications, the majority of those who were transferred to ICU with burn or COVID-19 or other respiratory disorders were at low nutritional risk (mNUTRIC score:0-<3) (66.70%, and 67.20%, respectively); whereas relatively all post CABG subjects were at intermediate nutritional risk (mNUTRIC score:3-<5) (n= 48, 96.00%). A greater proportion of subjects in the miscellaneous category (n=12, 20.00%) were at high nutritional risk (mNUTRIC score:5-9) (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: It was revealed that approximately all post CABG and those admitted to ICU with miscellaneous causes were at a higher risk for impaired nutritional status and may require more in-depth evaluation for providing earlier nutritional support.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Pakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 55 No. 4 (2022), pp. 318-325

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By