Comparison of Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality and Morbidity in Urban and Rural Residential Areas in Jatinangor Subdistrict, West Java, Indonesia: An Epidemiological Community Study

dc.contributor.authorTiksnadi, Badai Bhatara
dc.contributor.authorWahyudi, Kurnia
dc.contributor.authorAfrianti, Rien
dc.contributor.authorSofiatin, Yulia
dc.contributor.authorFihaya, Faris Yuflih
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Maulana
dc.contributor.authorTarsidin, Najmi Fauzan
dc.contributor.authorAmalia, Lisda
dc.contributor.authorRoesli, Rully MA
dc.contributor.authorAkbar, M. Rizki
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-05T09:15:58Z
dc.date.copyright2023
dc.date.issued2023-12-31
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Residential areas are considered part of the sociocultural aspect for determining health but are rarely studied in a cardiovascular disease-community study in developing countries. Jatinangor, considered a university area, has unique characteristics surrounded by urban and rural villages. We aim to investigate the association of residential areas in Jatinangor with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Methodology: A cross-sectional study from July to November 2018 was done in appointed rural and urban areas in Jatinangor district, West Java, Indonesia. Cardiovascular disease is defined using a self-reported questionnaire. Cardiovascular death was identified through a verbal autopsy performed by a general practitioner as an interviewer. The morbidity data were obtained from September to October 2018, while the mortality data were obtained from July to November 2018. Poisson regression was done to determine the association of residential areas to cardiovascular disease morbidity. Results: Data were obtained from 1469 respondents; 58.7% were from rural areas. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease morbidity is higher in urban than rural areas (5.6% vs. 2.5%, p=0.004). There were 42 cases of death reported during the study period, with 33 deaths considered caused by cardiovascular disease. The urban-rural differences in cardiovascular mortality showed no significant differences (p=0.388). The unadjusted model of the association of the urban-rural residential area with cardiovascular disease morbidity was (PR 2.253 (95% CI 1.262, 4.024)) while the adjusted model was (PR 2.264 (95% CI 1.257, 4.078, p = 0.007)). Conclusion: Urban area is associated with two times higher cardiovascular disease morbidity but not with mortality than those who live in rural areas.
dc.format.extentpp. 268-272
dc.identifier.citationPakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 56 No. 4 (2023), pp. 268-272
dc.identifier.doi10.47144/phj.v56i4.2582
dc.identifier.urihttps://pakheartjournal.com/index.php/pk/article/view/2582
dc.identifier.urihttps://ds.pakheartjournal.com/handle/phj/879
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPakistan Heart Journal
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 56 No. 4 (2023)
dc.rights.holderPakistan Heart Journal
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.titleComparison of Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality and Morbidity in Urban and Rural Residential Areas in Jatinangor Subdistrict, West Java, Indonesia: An Epidemiological Community Study
dc.typeArticle
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7566-8457
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1409-6010
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-4033
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5553-4144
person.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-8676

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2582-1-12368-1-10-20231231.pdf
Size:
263.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections