Cardiac Rehabilitation Improves Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

dc.contributor.authorHaider, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAli, Mehak
dc.contributor.authorHameed, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorChaudhry, Iftikhar
dc.contributor.authorKhalid, Salman
dc.contributor.authorAli, Syed
dc.contributor.authorNiaz, Arham
dc.contributor.authorMajeed, Uzair
dc.contributor.authorEjaz, Zoya
dc.contributor.authorHussain, Anum
dc.contributor.authorAmjad, Qasim
dc.contributor.authorNazir, Sara
dc.contributor.authorTahirkheli, Naeem
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-05T09:33:46Z
dc.date.copyright2025
dc.date.issued2025-03-23
dc.description.abstractObjective: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recognized as an essential intervention to improve survival in patients with chronic heart conditions, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Methodology: This single-center observational study analyzed all CABG procedures performed between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into two groups after CABG: participated in CR (CR arm) and those who refused or were unable to participate in CR (non-CR arm). The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, CV mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), post-CABG acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE =composite of ACS, CVA and CV death). Results: A total of 1,890 patients were included (CR= 1,641; non-CR= 129) in the study. The non-CR group had a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), prior ACS, congestive heart failure, and were more frequently prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs post-CABG as compared with the CR group. The adjusted multivariate analysis showed that the non-CR vs CR had significantly higher all-cause mortality (12.9% vs 2.6%) (Odds Ratio [OR] = 5.49, 95% CI: 3.046-9.894, p< 0.001), CV mortality (3.1% vs 1.1%) (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 0.963-8.621, p = 0.048). The incidence of SCD was significantly higher in the non-CR group (4.7%) compared to the CR group (1.7%) (OR = 6.76, 95% CI: 2.494-18.182, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of post-CABG ACS (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.211-1.621, p = 0.297), CVA (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.394-3.125, p = 0.844), or MACE (OR =1.13, 95% CI: 0.608-2.096, p = 0.701). Conclusion: Participation in cardiac rehabilitation following CABG surgery is associated with significantly improved survival, reduced all-cause and CV mortality, and lower rates of sudden cardiac death.
dc.format.extentpp. 14
dc.identifier.citationPakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 58 No. s1 (2025), pp. 14
dc.identifier.doi10.47144/phj.v58is1.3051
dc.identifier.urihttps://pakheartjournal.com/index.php/pk/article/view/3051
dc.identifier.urihttps://ds.pakheartjournal.com/handle/phj/1639
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPakistan Cardiac Society
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPakistan Heart Journal; Vol. 58 No. s1 (2025)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.titleCardiac Rehabilitation Improves Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3051-1-16408-1-10-20250323.pdf
Size:
481.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format